Quarterly Financial Report for the Quarter ended June 30, 2018

ISSN 2561-7044

Statement outlining results, risks and significant changes in operations, personnel and program

A. Introduction

This quarterly report has been prepared by management as required by section 65.1 of the Financial Administration Act, and in the form and manner prescribed by the Treasury Board. It has not been subject to an external audit or review. This quarterly report should be read in conjunction with the Main Estimates and Supplementary Estimates.

The Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP) was created on December 12, 2006, with the coming into force of the Director of Public Prosecutions Act. The ODPP is an independent prosecution service mandated to prosecute offences that are under the jurisdiction of the Attorney General of Canada.

On October 1, 2014, pursuant to amendments to the Canada Elections Act, the Office of the Commissioner of Canada Elections (OCCE) was transferred from Elections Canada to the ODPP. The Commissioner of Canada Elections and the Director of Public Prosecutions exercise their statutory duties independently from each other while operating within the same organization.

The ODPP has two core responsibilities. The first is that prosecution services are provided in an independent, impartial and fair manner. The mandate of the ODPP includes:

• providing legal advice to federal investigative agencies and government departments on the criminal law implications of investigations and prosecutions;
• initiating and conducting federal prosecutions; and
• intervening in matters that raise questions of public interest that may affect the conduct of prosecutions or related investigations.

The second core responsibility is in respect of the work of the OCCE. It provides that compliance and enforcement activities under the Canada Elections Act and Referendum Act are conducted by the OCCE in an independent, impartial, and fair manner. Activities related to this mandate include:

• using non-punitive and informal corrective measures in response to certain situations of non-compliance and of formal measures for others, such as compliance agreements, injunctions, and applications for the judicial deregistration of a registered party; and
• taking enforcement measures to respond to situations of non-compliance, including deciding which matters will be referred to the ODPP for possible prosecution and what charges will be recommended.

Internal services are groups of related activities and resources that are administered to support the needs of programs and other corporate obligations of an organization.

B. Basis of Presentation

This quarterly report has been prepared by management using an expenditure basis of accounting. The accompanying Statement of Authorities includes the ODPP's spending authorities granted by Parliament, and those used by the ODPP consistent with the Main Estimates and Supplementary Estimates. This quarterly report has been prepared using a financial reporting framework designed to meet financial information needs with respect to the use of spending authorities.

The authority of Parliament is required before moneys can be spent by the Government. Approvals are given in the form of annually approved limits through appropriation acts or through legislation in the form of statutory spending authority for specific purposes.

When Parliament is dissolved for the purposes of a general election, section 30 of the Financial Administration Act authorizes the Governor General, under certain conditions, to issue a special warrant authorizing the Government to withdraw funds from the Consolidated Revenue Fund. A special warrant is deemed to be an appropriation for the fiscal year in which it is issued.

The ODPP uses the full accrual method of accounting to prepare and present its annual departmental financial statements that are part of the departmental results reporting process. However, the spending authorities voted by Parliament remain on an expenditure basis.

C. Highlights of Fiscal Quarter and Fiscal Year-to-date Results

1. Spending Authorities

At the end of the first quarter of 2018-19, the ODPP had total spending authorities of $181.5 million available for use as detailed in Chart 1 and Appendix A. This amount represents the 2018-19 Main Estimates. Overall, the ODPP’s authorities for 2018-19 are similar to the previous year’s total Main Estimates of $181.4 million, but the allocation of funds differs in that a decrease in funding for professional services (collection of outstanding federal fines) is offset by an increase in anticipated salary adjustments (collective agreement), and an increase in repair and maintenance for real property projects.

2. Expenditures for the Quarter ended June 30, 2018

During the first quarter of 2018-19, the ODPP spent $47.9 million compared to $42.7 million for the same period in 2017-18, as detailed in Appendix B. The increase of $5.2 million (or 12%), is mainly due to an increase in salary expenditures, and an increase in professional services expenditures due to the timing of payments, combined with a slower collection of revenues compared to the last year due to timing of invoicing.

3. Year-to-date Authorities and Expenditures as at June 30, 2018

At the end of June 2018, the ODPP had spent $47.9 million (or 26%) of its total authorities of $181.5 million as detailed in Appendix B. At the same time last year, the ODPP had spent 24% of its total authorities.

D. Risks and Uncertainties

The ODPP’s key corporate risks are identified and assessed through an annual update of the Corporate Risk Profile. This year, a number of key risks could have financial impacts should they materialize. Strategies have been put in place to mitigate them.

The PPSC does not determine the number or types of cases referred to it for prosecution, nor does it control all of the levers of the criminal justice system. This contributed to a risk that the organization may have insufficient funding to meet its prosecutorial obligations. In order to mitigate this risk, the PPSC continued to monitor its business practices and worked collaboratively with investigative agencies to ensure resources were managed in a cost effective manner through caseload and resource planning. Subsequent to 2017-18 year-end, the PPSC strengthened this strategy by implementing additional financial controls and measures, including more frequent monitoring, and renewed discussions with Central Agencies to explore options to augment available funds in alignment with the PPSC’s mandate.

The funding pressures from the Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC) with respect to mandated relocations and/or renovations and the implementation of workplace 2.0 have a significant impact on the budget of the ODPP. The ODPP has developed a Strategic Real Property Plan from 2017 to 2021 that is continually reviewed to realign the funding levels of each project based on urgency.

E. Significant Changes in Relations to Operations, Personnel and Programs

No significant changes were noted during the first quarter of fiscal year 2018-19.

Approval by Senior Officials

Approved by:


________________________
Kathleen Roussel
Director of Public Prosecutions and Deputy Attorney General of Canada


Ottawa, Canada


________________________
Date

_______________________
Mélanie Lamoureux, CPA, CMA
Acting Chief Financial Officer

Appendix A

Appendix B